Read Full Judgment: Bhupatbhai Bachubhai Chavda & Anr. v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court of India heard Criminal Appeal No. 334 of 2019, involving father and son appellants, accused of assaulting and causing the death of an individual named Punjabhai in 1996. Initially acquitted by the Sessions Court, the State of Gujarat appealed the decision, resulting in the High Court converting the acquittal into a conviction under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The Supreme Court’s intervention was sought thereafter.
The prosecution’s case relied heavily on witness testimony, particularly that of PW-4 Karshanbhai, an eyewitness. However, discrepancies emerged between his statements and those of other witnesses, casting doubt on the accuracy of his account. The High Court, nevertheless, overturned the acquittal based on PW-4’s testimony, leading to the appellants’ life imprisonment.
In its deliberation, the Supreme Court highlighted fundamental errors in the High Court’s approach. It emphasized that an order of acquittal strengthens the presumption of innocence, requiring the appellate court to establish beyond doubt the guilt of the accused. However, the High Court failed to demonstrate conclusively that the appellants’ guilt was the only plausible conclusion.
Moreover, the High Court’s reliance on PW-4’s testimony, despite inconsistencies and potential biases, was deemed inappropriate. The Court noted that the burden of proof lies solely with the prosecution, and the accused need not furnish evidence unless mandated by specific legal provisions. In this case, the High Court erroneously shifted the burden onto the appellants.
Further scrutiny of witness testimonies revealed contradictions and discrepancies that undermined the prosecution’s case. The Supreme Court concurred with the Trial Court’s assessment that PW-4’s testimony lacked credibility, leading to the conclusion that the evidence did not support a conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court’s judgment and restoring the Trial Court’s acquittal. The appellants’ convictions were overturned, and they were ordered to be released, barring any other pending cases. This decision was reached to uphold the presumption of innocence and ensure a fair trial based on credible evidence.
Disclaimer: The case is presented solely for educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice or imply any legal conclusion. Readers should consult qualified legal professionals for specific legal advice or guidance related to any legal matters.
